While policies in some classes of business promise to indemnify
the insured, this has to be done subject to the express terms of the
policy, if any. Some of these terms mean that something less than indemnity is
payable. For example:
(a) Average: Most non-marine property insurances
are expressly subject to average. This means that the insurer expects
the insured property to be insured for its full value. If it is not, in the
event of a loss the amount payable will be reduced in proportion to the under-insurance.
For example, if the actual value of the affected property at the time of a loss
was $4 million and it was only insured for $1 million, we may say that the property
was at the time of the loss only 25% insured. Therefore, by the application
of average, only 25% of the loss is payable.
In view of this penalty for under-insurance, it is very
important for insurance intermediaries to do their best to ensure that their
clients will arrange full value insurance.
Note: In marine
insurance, ‘average’ has a totally different meaning. Here it means partial
loss, a loss other than total loss. Average in marine insurance is complex
and beyond the needs of this present study.
(b) Policy excess/deductible: An excess or deductible
is a policy provision whereby the insured is not covered for losses up to the
specified amount, which is always deducted from each claim.
Suppose a motor policy is comprehensive, with a $4,000
excess for damage to the insured vehicle. If an accident occurs and the repair
bill for the car amounts to $14,000, the insurer is only liable for $10,000. On
the other hand, with a minor accident and repairs costing $3,000, the insurer would
have no liability at all.
(c) Policy franchise: Seldom seen today (except
for time franchise – see example below), it is similar to an excess in that it
eliminates small claims. On the other hand, it is different from an excess in
that if the loss exceeds or reaches the franchise – depending on the wording
used - the loss is payable in full. Like an excess, a franchise can be
expressed as a percentage, an amount of loss, or a time period. Suppose a ship
which is insured for $5,000,000 subject to a 5% franchise sustains insured
damage. If repairs cost only $100,000 (2%), nothing is payable by the insurer.
But if repairs cost $1,000,000 (20%), the loss is payable in full.
Example of time franchise: A particular hospitalisation
policy contains a 2- day franchise provision; in other words, there is a
waiting period of two days. If the insured person stays in hospital for one
day, no expenses are reimbursable. But if he has to stay for 5 days, the policy
pays the medical expenses incurred during the whole of that 5-day period.
(d) Policy limits: As the sum insured is
the insurer's maximum liability, any loss exceeding that limit will not be
fully indemnified. Other types of limits may also exist within the policy
terms; examples include: (i) Single Article Limit: It is a limit
commonly found in a household contents policy. Where such a policy covers property
described in broad terms like ‘contents’ for a stated amount, there is no way
the insurer can tell whether the insured contents will not, at the time of loss,
be found to include an article which is so valuable that its value already
accounts for, say, 90% of the sum insured for the whole of the contents. This
is a situation the insurer will not want to see, partly because of the theft
risk it represents. In fact, the insured could have declared the value of this
item of contents to the insurer, requiring that it be separately subject to a
sum insured representing its value. The benefit of this approach is that the
insurer will be liable for an insured loss of this item of property up to its
own sum insured. On the other hand, in the event that an insured has not made
such an article the subject of a separate sum insured, the insurer will have to
restrict the amount payable for a loss of this item to a limit specified in the
policy, called the ‘single article limit’.
0 comments:
Post a Comment